Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment
How many photos should ideally be taken for a dangerous dog case?
Only two: one of the victim and one of the dog
At least five, including different angles of the incident
No photos are needed, just written statements
Three: one of the scene, one of the dog, and one of the victim
The correct answer is: Only two: one of the victim and one of the dog
In a dangerous dog case, it's crucial to document as much evidence as possible to provide a clear picture of the incident for future reference, investigation, and potential legal actions. Taking only two photos—one of the victim and one of the dog—fails to capture the context of the situation adequately. While documenting the victim and the dog may seem sufficient, it does not include important elements such as the scene of the incident, any surrounding environment, multiple angles, or other relevant factors that could provide insight into the dog's behavior or the circumstances of the attack. This lack of comprehensive documentation could hinder the investigation and the determination of liability. The correct approach would involve capturing multiple photographs that illustrate various aspects of the incident, such as different angles of the scene, the dog's demeanor, and the physical state of the victim. This thorough documentation helps law enforcement or animal control officers evaluate the situation more accurately, ensuring they have all necessary evidence to make informed decisions.